San Francisco
1
cheaper categories
Tied
0
categories
London
5
cheaper categories
Category Breakdown
Overall Cost
130
San Francisco
30 pts pricier
100
London
CheaperRent
195
San Francisco
95 pts pricier
100
London
CheaperGroceries
108
San Francisco
8 pts pricier
100
London
CheaperRestaurants
110
San Francisco
10 pts pricier
100
London
CheaperTransport
90
San Francisco
Cheaper10 pts cheaper
100
London
Utilities
105
San Francisco
5 pts pricier
100
London
CheaperSalary Equivalence
How much you'd need in London to match a San Francisco salary
| Salary in San Francisco | Equivalent in London | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| £30,000 | £23,077 | £6,923 less |
| £40,000 | £30,769 | £9,231 less |
| £50,000 | £38,462 | £11,538 less |
| £60,000 | £46,154 | £13,846 less |
| £80,000 | £61,538 | £18,462 less |
| £100,000 | £76,923 | £23,077 less |
San Francisco vs London: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 30%. London is the more affordable option.
Rent: San Francisco has a rent index of 195, while London has 100.
Average Salaries: San Francisco: £5,530/month vs London: £3,800/month (both in GBP).
Out of 6 categories, San Francisco wins 1, while London wins 5.
Compare more cities or calculate your UK take-home pay.