San Francisco
0
cheaper categories
Tied
0
categories
Birmingham
6
cheaper categories
Category Breakdown
Overall Cost
130
San Francisco
60 pts pricier
70
Birmingham
CheaperRent
195
San Francisco
145 pts pricier
50
Birmingham
CheaperGroceries
108
San Francisco
14 pts pricier
94
Birmingham
CheaperRestaurants
110
San Francisco
32 pts pricier
78
Birmingham
CheaperTransport
90
San Francisco
8 pts pricier
82
Birmingham
CheaperUtilities
105
San Francisco
17 pts pricier
88
Birmingham
CheaperSalary Equivalence
How much you'd need in Birmingham to match a San Francisco salary
| Salary in San Francisco | Equivalent in Birmingham | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| £30,000 | £16,154 | £13,846 less |
| £40,000 | £21,538 | £18,462 less |
| £50,000 | £26,923 | £23,077 less |
| £60,000 | £32,308 | £27,692 less |
| £80,000 | £43,077 | £36,923 less |
| £100,000 | £53,846 | £46,154 less |
San Francisco vs Birmingham: Summary
The overall cost of living differs by 60%. Birmingham is the more affordable option.
Rent: San Francisco has a rent index of 195, while Birmingham has 50.
Average Salaries: San Francisco: £5,530/month vs Birmingham: £2,400/month (both in GBP).
Out of 6 categories, San Francisco wins 0, while Birmingham wins 6.
Compare more cities or calculate your UK take-home pay.